To listen to story Click Here.
Click on Image to watch video.
Morning Edition, January 27, 2009 · The American Library Association has given the prestigious Newbery Medal for children's literature to Neil Gaiman for his novel The Graveyard Book. It's the story of a boy raised by the ghostly inhabitants of a cemetery.
Euan Kerr reports for Minnesota Public Radio.
"I am so wonderfully befuddled," the best-selling author said Monday after winning the 88th annual Newbery for "The Graveyard Book," a spooky, but (he says) family friendly story about a boy raised by a vampire, a werewolf and a witch.
"I never really thought of myself as a Newbery winner. It's such a very establishment kind of award, in the right kind of way, with the world of librarians pointing at the book saying, `This is worthy of the ages.' And I'm so very used to working in, and enjoying working in, essentially the gutter."
Gaiman, known for his "Sandman" comic-book series, had worked on the "Graveyard Book" off and on for more than 20 years, an understandable delay for the author of more than 20 books and the winner of prizes for science fiction, fantasy and horror.
Gaiman is a beloved writer for adults and children, but "The Graveyard Book" isn't the coziest read, at least at the beginning, with its image of a knife so sharp that "if it sliced you, you might not even know you had been cut, not immediately."
He says "The Graveyard Book" was inspired in part by "The Jungle Book," Rudyard Kipling's classic about a boy raised by animals. Gaiman's book opens with a baby boy escaping an assassin who kills his parents and older sister. The boy totters to a decrepit cemetery, where he's adopted by ghosts, christened Nobody Owens (Bod for short) and given the Freedom of the Graveyard.
On Gaiman's blog, he writes that "The Graveyard Book" is not a children's book. It's "a book for pretty much for all ages, although I'm not sure how far down that actually starts. I think I would have loved it when I was eight, but I don't think that all eight-year olds were like me."
On Monday, Gaiman said he has been following the debate about the Newbery, never imagining he would become part of it. Beloved by readers and book-sellers, he is certainly far more popular than the past few Newbery winners, and he doesn't think his novel, beyond a little death and darkness, is upsetting.
"Apart from the first few pages, it doesn't exist to frighten people or trouble people," he said. "I've written my share of disturbing stuff, but this book is really a way of trying to think about the process of growing up, and, of course, the fundamentally joyous tragedy of being a parent, that if you do your job properly, your kids will grow up and leave you."
Gaiman, 48, has three children. Two have grown and moved away.
by Fred Kight
Morning Edition, January 26, 2009 · The states of Ohio and Kentucky are battling over a most unlikely object: a graffiti-covered rock.
From a distance, Indian Head Rock isn't much to look at, an unremarkable, brownish boulder about the size of a Volkswagen Beetle. But a closer look reveals what makes the rock — first written about in an archeological publication in 1847 — more than just an ordinary boulder.
"In early days, it was called the Portsmouth Indians' head rock. It's a life-sized depiction of a smiley face," Nichols says.
The trouble started last year when the 8-ton, sandstone boulder was hauled out of the Ohio River. On one side of the river is Portsmouth and on the other is South Shore, Ky. Indian Head Rock was submerged 60 feet from the Kentucky shore until it was fished out.
Click Image to enlarge.
Finding the rock wasn't easy. Once partially submerged, it hadn't been seen since the 1920s after navigational dams raised the river level and hid the boulder for decades.
But historian Steve Shaffer, the central character in this ongoing fight, had read stories about Indian Head Rock when he was a kid and vowed to find it. After many diving excursions, Shaffer and some buddies located the relic, pulled it out of the river and donated it to Portsmouth.
The mayor of Portsmouth, recognizing that the Ohio River is actually in Kentucky, offered it to the town of South Shore, Ky. Officials there weren't interested, so the plan was to display the boulder in Portsmouth.
That's when Kentucky state officials got involved; they say the rock belongs to them. Kentucky Attorney General Jack Conway wrote a letter demanding its return.
"This was a registered antiquity in Kentucky and it was taken, and that's theft of an antiquity under the statute," Conway says.
But Ohio officials said the Indian Head Rock belonged to them. To further complicate the matter, the Army Corps of Engineers claims it has jurisdiction over the boulder.
Shaffer isn't talking to the media because taking the boulder from the Ohio River bottom put him in legal jeopardy. He and one of his helpers were indicted this summer on felony charges.
It's not clear what will happen to Indian Head Rock. For now, this piece of American history sits a most inauspicious place — in a corner of a municipal garage in Portsmouth.
Fred Kight reports for member station WOUB.
Sam was a galunky kind of guy,
my cousin says. He walked like this.
He takes on a bow-legged swagger
that makes us laugh. And boy,
could he drink beer. He lifts his hand,
tipping imaginary cans in quick succession.
He talked real fast too. Back then we laughed,
asked what was the rush? Never slowed him any.
Girls loved him. He was such a big guy,
think they figured he must have a big heart.
My cousin slows a little in his walk,
tugs on his ear to remember more.
"Fishing" by Kate Scott, from Stitches. © Peterloo Poets, 2003.
With a tough economy and almost daily forecasts of additional layoffs, more Americans are looking for new ways to bring home the bacon—often, by working from home.
But it's scammers who usually get fat off their work-seeking victims.
"With the economy heading south and more people losing their jobs, we see an increase in people looking for work-at-home opportunities," says Alison Preszler-Southwick, spokesperson for the national Council of Better Business Bureaus. "As a result, scammers step in and take advantage of them."
The Internet has proved a great recruiting tool for work-at-home prospects, allowing scammers to hide their identities and post phony "testimonials" of now-rich employees. But even when newspaper ads or telephone calls are used to enlist would-be workers, most work-at-home scams involve the same ploys:
"Bait-and-switch" schemes requiring upfront payment for materials. Victims may pay an initial cost and then not receive the promised supplies, instructions or "client" leads, or they may receive some goods but then must shell out more for the "complete package." In either case, the money paid out far exceeds the true value of the promised materials, and "leads" may simply be names or companies taken from the phone directory. Classic examples of these scams include stuffing envelopes, assembling crafts, entering data and billing medical costs.
"Check-forwarding" scams in which victims receive a check for promised or completed work—only to be asked to wire a portion of it back to the scammer. The received check inevitably proves to be counterfeit, and banks hold victims responsible; victims may also face check fraud charges. Scammers usually operate from online job sites, where they advertise for U.S. agents for phony overseas companies. A variation is the "reshipping" scam, in which victims receive merchandise at their homes to be reshipped overseas. But the goods are often purchased with stolen credit cards, leaving the reshipper subject to criminal charges for receiving and transporting stolen goods.
New ploys that have recently emerged include:
Mentoring programs. "[Scammers] place advertisements in local newspapers to 'Start Your Own Business,' offering a $69 startup kit in any of about a dozen different opportunities," notes Kevin Farrell of the Lee County Sheriff's Office in southwest Florida. "But once that money is sent, the kit says you need to pay $650 more to have a mentor give you personal instructions over the telephone." Farrell notes that in his area, with its large retiree population, such work-at-home scams seem to target older people.
Rebate processing. In this ruse, says Preszler-Southwick, victims answer job ads, thinking they will process rebate forms for leading companies. "In reality, these jobs instead involve placing advertisements on the Internet and selling products. Victims pay upfront fees and are promised their money back if not satisfied. What we're seeing is they don't get their money back."
The bottom line: Be suspicious of any job opportunity that requires any upfront fees or pays you with checks that require a Western Union or other wire transfer. According to an October 2007 report by the Federal Trade Commission, about 2.5 million Americans—nearly 1 percent of the entire population—fall for work-at-home scams each year, and many are repeat victims. With today's bad economy, there's no indication that's about to change.
If you've already fallen victim, contact your state attorney general's office and your local consumer protection office. Also, alert the newspaper or online job site where you saw the job advertised.
For more information on preventing these scams, click here.
Big Breaking News on the cyber-politics front: The Obama transition web site -- Change.gov -– has been renamed WhiteHouse.gov and started operations. With a heartening message from the Macon Phillips, the Director of New Media for the White House:
"President Obama started his career as a community organizer on the South Side of Chicago, where he saw firsthand what people can do when they come together for a common cause. Citizen participation will be a priority for the Administration, and the internet will play an important role in that."
And Congress has an open invitation to join the act. YouTube, which began airing Barack Obama's weekly messages right after his election, is now creating two special congressional web pages, one for senators, another for representatives.
The federal lawmakers will be invited to post videos with their remarks on topics of their choosing, inviting constituents to respond with questions and comments.
And now there's even competition on the move to Internet-era governance. The social action web site Change.org has seized on an early Obama idea: grassroots Americans should be able to generate fresh ideas, that officialdom needs to hear.
Four days before the inauguration, Change.org (which actually preceded Obama's site Change.gov by two years) released results of its own Internet survey. More than 658,000 votes were cast to select 10 favorite ideas (out of 7,800 submitted) that participants believed the new administration should consider.
Conducted jointly with the web site MySpace, the 10 top ideas have a distinctly leftward tilt–repeal of the USA Patriot Act, legalizing same-sex marriage, free universal health care, labeling all food containing genetically engineered ingredients, and higher education for all students.
But one recommendation favored small business, classically defended by conservatives: to exempt small American toy-makers from the expensive, extended testing of their products for children that Congress required last year in response to lead-tainted playthings imported from China.
And like early polling on Obama's own Change.gov site, major reform of drug laws–including a halt to arrests for medical or recreational use of marijuana–garnered some of the highest votes. Obama's transition team responding by saying he opposes legalization of marijuana. But this is one issue where the public's jumping ahead of our new leader.
Which is precisely the opportunity that web democracy brings: it lets the public both pose and vote on controversial issues that political leaders would just as soon ignore.
Which raises a new possibility: Could a deliberative national process involve more people–not just registering their votes on issues, but helping to frame issues and solutions? That's the plan of three organizations–AmericaSpeaks, Demos, and Everyday Democracy–in a recent report on strengthening U.S. democracy.
The idea is to have our new president "call for regular national discussions of one million Americans or more on the issues of highest public concern, like foreign policy, energy, taxes, health care, and jobs." There'd be a White House Office of Citizen Engagement to organize the process, together with a non-partisan working group of citizens appointed by the majority and minority leadership of Congress.
Americans could participate several ways–by conversations in homes, workplaces or community centers, by participating in national town meetings linked by satellite, or in small groups "meeting" online in "virtual" discussion space before registering their priorities.
The idea is to create a truly serious nation-wide discussion process. There would be skilled facilitators and participants would receive "balanced, accessible educational materials to ensure that everyone begins with adequate context to come to informed judgments."
Wow! Not just opinions, but judgments based on clear, objective information? What a radical idea!
And the recommendations couldn't disappear into some black hole–Congress would be required to hold follow-up hearings to address them, and the president to issue a written response. The idea's that the media would then treat the dialogue-and-report process as major news.
Imagine if there'd been such a process shortly after the 9/11 attacks. Or now on the future fiscal issues in Medicare and Social Security. Or on truly tough-to-settle issues, like correcting America's world-leading prison population levels. The power of special-interest lobbies to dominate hearings, or distort public debate with misleading advertising, would likely be dealt a major blow.
The idea sounds like an Obama natural. But why couldn't forward-looking members of Congress, kicking the traces of lobbyist influence, take a lead in advocating it?
As this inventive citizen consultative process gained momentum at the national level, it could also be tried out too on the state, regional or city level–again addressing critical issues and favoring the citizenry over monied lobbies in an unprecedented way.
The change we've been waiting for? I think so.
For reprints of Neal Peirce's column, please contact Washington Post Permissions, c/o PARS International Corp., WPPermissions@parsintl.com, fax 212-221-9195. For newspaper syndication sales, Washington Post Writers Group, 202-334-5375, wpwgsales@washpost.com.
Cairns is located on NW 5th and 6th avenues between NW Glisan Street and Union Station. Bourdette designed the series for the future MAX Green Line Union Station area to celebrate points of arrival and departure. The artist was inspired by the man-made stacks of stones, or cairns, that have traditionally marked trails as landmarks for navigation and memorials.
Five pieces from the series are completed, with the last one scheduled to be finished in January 2009. The pieces vary in size from 11' tall by 6' in diameter to 3' tall by 3' in diameter.
Bourdette is one of the most accomplished sculptors in the Northwest. Her works are included in many private and public collections, including those of the Portland Art Museum, Tacoma Art Museum, Boise Art Museum and Reed College.
The Mall art program is a collaboration with project partners, the Regional Arts and Culture Council and the downtown community
A FIRST SLEEPOVER
On Tuesday night, their first at the White House, the Obama girls had a party of their own.
Malia, 10, and Sasha, 7, had a sleepover party with classmates from Sidwell Friends School. They watched two movies — "High School Musical 3" and "Bolt" — and romped around the house in a scavenger hunt arranged by the White House staff.
Perhaps the highlight? At the end of the hunt, the girls opened a door to find their favorite musical act: the Jonas Brothers. Kevin, Joe and Nick Jonas were waiting inside. Surprise!
Currently receiving a very polished production from Profile Theatre, this boot-camp play may prompt viewers to think about the questionable "don't ask, don't tell" policy regarding gays in the military, the troubling tension between military discipline and brutality, or the unfortunate persistence of religious, ethnic, and racial prejudices, but it primarily tells an up-beat coming-of-age story set during the World War II era. Good spirited humor and gentle nostalgia wash over the disturbing issues.
Between these bookend scenes, the body of the play traces the relations of the soldiers to their old-style, tough Biloxi drill sergeant but also includes off-the-base sequences in which Eugene loses his virginity and then falls in love.
Director Pat Patton has a good feel for the play -- nicely balancing comedy and earnestness. Patton keeps the loosely structured piece moving at a brisk clip and draws strong, sharply defined performances from all in the ensemble.
Alec Wilson grows into the role of Eugene, who is both a participant in and a narrator of the action; Wilson smoothly makes the transitions between well-meaning innocence and wry commentary.
Among the actors playing Eugene's fellow recruits, Matthew Sa especially stands out. He adeptly captures the fragile nature and uncompromising self-confidence of the sensitive, intellectual, but willful individualist, Epstein.
Todd Hermanson gives dimension to the over-bearing drill sergeant, Merwin J. Toomey. He does well with the bullying, loud aspects of this character, but he also movingly conveys Toomey's gentler side and inner contradictions at play's end.
Set designer Tal Sanders finds various clever solutions to the play's cinematic loose structure, and Rose Etta Menger's lighting as well as Rodolpho Ortega's sound design go a long way toward establishing the multiple locations required by the play.
All told, this is Simon at his best. The play might not be politically or socially contentious, but it is fun, and Patton and company have done it justice.
"Biloxi Blues"
When: 8 p.m. Thursday-Saturday and 2 p.m. Sunday, through Feb. 15
Where: Theater! Theatre!, 3430 S.E. Belmont St.
Tickets: $12-$28, 503-242-0080 or online
Web site: profiletheatre.org
The tradition of the Cabinet dates back to the beginnings of the Presidency itself. Established in Article II, Section 2, of the Constitution, the Cabinet's role is to advise the President on any subject he may require relating to the duties of each member's respective office.
The Cabinet includes the Vice President and the heads of 15 executive departments — the Secretaries of Agriculture, Commerce, Defense, Education, Energy, Health and Human Services, Homeland Security, Housing and Urban Development, Interior, Labor, State, Transportation, Treasury, and Veterans Affairs, as well as the Attorney General.
In order of succession to the Presidency:
Department of State
Secretary-designate: Hillary R. Clinton
www.state.gov
Department of the Treasury
Secretary-designate: Timothy F. Geithner
www.treasury.gov
Department of Defense
Secretary: Robert M. Gates
www.defenselink.mil
Department of Justice
Attorney General-designate: Eric H. Holder
www.usdoj.gov
Department of the Interior
Secretary-designate: Ken L. Salazar
www.doi.gov
Department of Agriculture
Secretary-designate: Tom J. Vilsack
www.usda.gov
Department of Commerce
www.commerce.gov
Department of Labor
Secretary-designate: Hilda L. Solis
www.dol.gov
Department of Health and Human Services
Secretary-designate: Tom A. Daschle
www.hhs.gov
Department of Housing and Urban Development
Secretary-designate: Shaun Donovan
www.hud.gov
Department of Transportation
Secretary-designate: Ray H. LaHood
www.dot.gov
Department of Energy
Secretary-designate: Steven Chu
www.energy.gov
Department of Education
Secretary-designate: Arne Duncan
www.ed.gov
Department of Veterans Affairs
Secretary-designate: Eric K. Shinseki
www.va.gov
Department of Homeland Security
Secretary-designate: Janet Napolitano
www.dhs.gov
Chief of Staff
Rahm Emanuel
Deputy Chiefs of Staff
Jim Messina
Mona Sutphen
Senior Advisors
David Axelrod
Valerie Jarrett
Pete Rouse
Every day, the President of the United States is faced with scores of decisions, each with important consequences for America's future. To provide the President with the support the he or she needs to govern effectively, the Executive Office of the President (EOP) was created in 1939 by President Franklin D. Roosevelt. The EOP has responsibility for tasks ranging from communicating the President's message to the American people to promoting our trade interests abroad.
Overseen by the White House Chief of Staff, the EOP has traditionally been home to many of the President's closest advisors.
The following entities exist within the Executive Office of the President:
Praise song for the day.
Each day we go about our business, walking past each other, catching each others' eyes or not, about to speak or speaking. All about us is noise. All about us is noise and bramble, thorn and din, each one of our ancestors on our tongues. Someone is stitching up a hem, darning a hole in a uniform, patching a tire, repairing the things in need of repair.
Someone is trying to make music somewhere with a pair of wooden spoons on an oil drum with cello, boom box, harmonica, voice.
A woman and her son wait for the bus.
A farmer considers the changing sky; A teacher says, "Take out your pencils. Begin."
We encounter each other in words, words spiny or smooth, whispered or declaimed; words to consider, reconsider.
We cross dirt roads and highways that mark the will of someone and then others who said, "I need to see what's on the other side; I know there's something better down the road."
We need to find a place where we are safe; We walk into that which we cannot yet see.
Say it plain, that many have died for this day. Sing the names of the dead who brought us here, who laid the train tracks, raised the bridges, picked the cotton and the lettuce, built brick by brick the glittering edifices they would then keep clean and work inside of.
Praise song for struggle; praise song for the day. Praise song for every hand-lettered sign; The figuring it out at kitchen tables.
Some live by "Love thy neighbor as thy self."
Others by first do no harm, or take no more than you need.
What if the mightiest word is love, love beyond marital, filial, national. Love that casts a widening pool of light. Love with no need to preempt grievance.
In today's sharp sparkle, this winter air, anything can be made, any sentence begun.
by Kathy Lohr
The Presidential Inaugural Committee has launched a Web site, USAService.org, to help people find volunteer opportunities close to their homes.
"I am asking you to make a lasting commitment to make better the lives of your fellow Americans — a commitment that must endure beyond one day, or even one presidency," Obama said in a YouTube appeal last week. "At this moment of great challenge and great change, I am asking you to play your part; to roll up your sleeves and join in the work of remaking this nation."